Call: 0123456789 | Email: info@example.com

[Solved]Does statute regulate evenhandedly with only Incidental effects on interstate commerce? _2) Does statute serve a legitimate local purpos

[Solved]Does statute regulate evenhandedly with only Incidental effects on interstate commerce? _2) Does statute serve a legitimate local purpos

$ 13.00

Hughes v. Oklahoma
Oklahoma prohibits shipping or selling minnows out of state to protect Ok minnows.
. Hughes bought minnows in Ok and took them to texas.
Convicted of voilating state law.
Ok supreme court upheld statute as constitutional to protect Ok natural resources.Hughes appealed.
U.S.Supreme court :Reserve for Hughes
Test for constitutionality of such regulation :
_1) Does statute regulate evenhandedly with only
Incidental effects on interstate commerce?
_2) Does statute serve a legitimate local purpose. And if so
_3)could it be done by alternative means to promote this purpose as well without discriminating against interstate commerce?
Fine for state of protect wildlife, but could done in less discriminatory wa

SKU: 9092

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “[Solved]Does statute regulate evenhandedly with only Incidental effects on interstate commerce? _2) Does statute serve a legitimate local purpos”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *